Ashley Greve the person who wrote this article said In 2010, President Barack Obama declared January as National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month. Each January since, those engaged in the fight against human trafficking have taken advantage of the additional attention bestowed upon the issue to raise awareness and engage a new cohort of potential activists. They wanted the issue of sex trafficking to be known out there for people to recognize how people suffer without owning it many perspective views were seen in this article of kind people with power wanted to help for example Dr. Yvonne Zimmerman, author of the book Other Dreams of Freedom: Religion, Sex, and Human Trafficking. Dr. Zimmerman presented a narrative on liberal Christian theology and its approaches to anti-slavery work.
Dr. Julie Laser from DU’s Graduate School of Social Work co-presented with her colleague Ida Seiferd on clinical approaches to working with victims and survivors. Attorney, professor and author T. Markus Funke demonstrated ways that bills regulating business supply chains mitigate the risk of forced labor used by sub-suppliers. Dr. AJ Alejano-Steele from Denver’s Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking presented the research behind Colorado’s Statewide Action Plan to combat trafficking and slavery. Becky Owens Bullard, Project Manager for the Denver Anti-Trafficking Alliance, discussed the nexus between intimate partner violence and human trafficking, which has received relatively little attention in the broader movement. All of these people are doctors or psychologist that are helping the victims to get cure they are aware of what's happening to them their perspectives are so different compare to others who don't care since it's not happening to them.
Two points of views would be PRO: "Criminalizing the sex industry creates ideal conditions for rampant exploitation and abuse of sex workers...[I]t is believed that trafficking in women, coercion and exploitation can only be stopped if the existence of prostitution is recognized and the legal and social rights of prostitutes are guaranteed."
Marjan Wijers
Chair of the European Commission's Expert Group on Trafficking in Human Beings
in her article in the book Global Sex Workers
1998. According to Marjan there's only one way to stop it and it would be if its legal meaning that since it would be legal not a lot of people would do it no more which that's a lie because people would do it more to get more money out of it. Another point of view would be CON: "I believe that we will never succeed in combating trafficking in women if we do not simultaneously work to abolish prostitution and the sexual exploitation of women and children. Particularly in light of the fact that many women in prostitution in countries that have legalised prostitution are originally victims of trafficking in women."
Margareta Winberg
Former Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden
Speech in Stockholm
Nov. 5-6, 2002. According to Margareta she thinks that legalized prostitution are originally victims of trafficking in women meaning that they didn't had no other choice but keep going on with it since they knew how that work. These two points of views are both from women and instead of supporting sex trafficking on women one goes a against it while the other on for it. This is why we as a country can move on further when we don't agree on the same thing we argue about it knowing that the issue is bad.
Dr. Julie Laser from DU’s Graduate School of Social Work co-presented with her colleague Ida Seiferd on clinical approaches to working with victims and survivors. Attorney, professor and author T. Markus Funke demonstrated ways that bills regulating business supply chains mitigate the risk of forced labor used by sub-suppliers. Dr. AJ Alejano-Steele from Denver’s Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking presented the research behind Colorado’s Statewide Action Plan to combat trafficking and slavery. Becky Owens Bullard, Project Manager for the Denver Anti-Trafficking Alliance, discussed the nexus between intimate partner violence and human trafficking, which has received relatively little attention in the broader movement. All of these people are doctors or psychologist that are helping the victims to get cure they are aware of what's happening to them their perspectives are so different compare to others who don't care since it's not happening to them.
Two points of views would be PRO: "Criminalizing the sex industry creates ideal conditions for rampant exploitation and abuse of sex workers...[I]t is believed that trafficking in women, coercion and exploitation can only be stopped if the existence of prostitution is recognized and the legal and social rights of prostitutes are guaranteed."
Marjan Wijers
Chair of the European Commission's Expert Group on Trafficking in Human Beings
in her article in the book Global Sex Workers
1998. According to Marjan there's only one way to stop it and it would be if its legal meaning that since it would be legal not a lot of people would do it no more which that's a lie because people would do it more to get more money out of it. Another point of view would be CON: "I believe that we will never succeed in combating trafficking in women if we do not simultaneously work to abolish prostitution and the sexual exploitation of women and children. Particularly in light of the fact that many women in prostitution in countries that have legalised prostitution are originally victims of trafficking in women."
Margareta Winberg
Former Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden
Speech in Stockholm
Nov. 5-6, 2002. According to Margareta she thinks that legalized prostitution are originally victims of trafficking in women meaning that they didn't had no other choice but keep going on with it since they knew how that work. These two points of views are both from women and instead of supporting sex trafficking on women one goes a against it while the other on for it. This is why we as a country can move on further when we don't agree on the same thing we argue about it knowing that the issue is bad.